Loading...

APC anti-DYKDDDDK Tag Antibody

Pricing & Availability
Clone
L5 (See other available formats)
Regulatory Status
RUO
Other Names
FLAG tag
Isotype
Rat IgG2a, λ
Ave. Rating
Submit a Review
Product Citations
publications
L5_APC_080812
HEK-293T cells transfected with plasmid encoding a DYKDDDDK-tagged protein were fixed, permeabilized, and then stained with anti-FLAG-tag (clone L5) APC (filled histogram) or rat IgG2a, κ APC isotype control (open histogram).
  • L5_APC_080812
    HEK-293T cells transfected with plasmid encoding a DYKDDDDK-tagged protein were fixed, permeabilized, and then stained with anti-FLAG-tag (clone L5) APC (filled histogram) or rat IgG2a, κ APC isotype control (open histogram).
See APC spectral data
Cat # Size Price Quantity Check Availability Save
637307 25 µg 91€
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
637308 100 µg 280€
Check Availability


Need larger quantities of this item?
Request Bulk Quote
Description

The DYKDDDDK tag, commonly referred to as Sigma®'s FLAG® Tag, is often used as a protein modification in order to simplify the labeling and detection of proteins.This unique amino acid sequence allows for specific antibody detection in western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and immunostaining techniques.Due to the short sequence, this modification is not likely to affect the structure or function of the modified proteins.

Product Details
Technical Data Sheet (pdf)

Product Details

Reactivity
Epitope tag
Antibody Type
Monoclonal
Host Species
Rat
Immunogen
DYKDDDDK-tagged mouse Langerin
Formulation
Phosphate-buffered solution, pH 7.2, containing 0.09% sodium azide.
Preparation
The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography and conjugated with APC under optimal conditions.
Concentration
0.2 mg/ml
Storage & Handling
The antibody solution should be stored undiluted between 2°C and 8°C, and protected from prolonged exposure to light. Do not freeze.
Application

FC - Quality tested

ICFC - Verified
Recommended Usage

Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by intracellular immunofluorescent staining with flow cytometric analysis. For flow cytometric staining, the suggested use of this reagent is ≤0.5 µg per million cells in 100 µl volume. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.

Excitation Laser
Red Laser (633 nm)
Application Notes

The L5 clone has been demonstrated to have 2-8 fold better sensitivity in WB than another commonly used antibody clone, M2.

Application References
  1. Park SH, et al. 2008. J Immunol Methods. 331:27.
  2. Moon SH, et al. 2010. J. Biol Chem. 285:12935. PubMed
  3. Sasaki M, et al. 2011. J. Biol Chem. 286:39370. PubMed
  4. Sonder SU, et al. 2012. J Immunol. 188:5906. PubMed
  5. Jiang Y, et al. 2013. Int Immunol. 25:235. PubMed
  6. Zuo X, et al. 2014. PLoS One. 9:84748. PubMed
  7. Toyo-Oak K, et al. 2014. J Neurosci. 34:12168. PubMed
Product Citations
  1. Shlamkovich T, et al. 2020. BMC Biology. 16(1):92. PubMed
  2. Uche UU, et al. 2018. J Exp Med. 215:3165. PubMed
  3. Braun E et al. 2019. Cell Rep. 27(7):2092-2104 . PubMed
  4. Tanigawa Y, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:4064. PubMed
  5. Wang J et al. 2018. Cell. 176(1-2):334-347 . PubMed
  6. Bosse KR et al. 2017. Cancer cell. 32(3):295-309 . PubMed
  7. Shaik FA, et al. 2019. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 316:L45. PubMed
  8. Lu Y, et al. 2020. Immunity. 52:782. PubMed
  9. Zah E, et al. 2020. Nat Commun. 11:2283. PubMed
  10. Willcox CR, et al. 2020. Immunity. 51(5):813-825.e4.. PubMed
  11. Ahn S, et al. 2019. Cancer Immunol Res. 0.828472222. PubMed
  12. Upadhyaya J, et al. 2016. PLoS One. 11: 0156347. PubMed
  13. Marco Barros R, et al. 2016. Cell. 167: 203-218. PubMed
  14. Draberova H, et al. 2020. EMBO J. 39:e104202. PubMed
  15. Yang M, et al. 2020. Appl Environ Microbiol. 86:00:00. PubMed
  16. Tong P, et al. 2021. Cell. :. PubMed
  17. Feng R, et al. 2020. Antib Ther. 10:3. PubMed
  18. Chen Y, et al. 2020. Cell. 1496:183. PubMed
  19. Gu T, et al. 2021. Front Immunol. 11:621441. PubMed
  20. Liu Y, et al. 2021. Cell. 184:3452. PubMed
  21. Guo X, et al. 2021. iScience. 24:103295. PubMed
  22. Halim L, et al. 2022. Front Immunol. 13:836549. PubMed
  23. Lei W, et al. 2022. Blood Cancer J. 12:35. PubMed
  24. Bhagirath AY, et al. 2022. FASEB Bioadv. 4:180. PubMed
  25. Chen JS, et al. 2022. Sci Immunol. 7:eabl5652. PubMed
  26. Bhatia V, et al. 2022. FASEB Bioadv. 4:574. PubMed
  27. Meléndez AV, et al. 2022. Cell Mol Life Sci. 79:513. PubMed
  28. Baek MO, et al. 2022. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 13:1277. PubMed
  29. Knizkova D, et al. 2022. Nat Immunol. 23:1644. PubMed
  30. Schiepers A, et al. 2023. Nature. 615:482. PubMed
  31. Lu V, et al. 2022. Dev Cell. 57:610. PubMed
  32. Li S, et al. 2022. Elife. 11:. PubMed
  33. Sun Y, et al. 2023. Sci Adv. 9:eade7151. PubMed
  34. Chen L, et al. 2023. Cell Biosci. 13:42. PubMed
  35. Li N, et al. 2023. Nat Commun. 14:1986. PubMed
RRID
AB_2561496 (BioLegend Cat. No. 637307)
AB_2561497 (BioLegend Cat. No. 637308)

Antigen Details

Biology Area
Cell Biology
Antigen References

1. Einhauer A. 2001. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods. 49:455.
2. Knappik A and Pluckthun A. 1994. Biotechniques. 17:754.

Gene ID
NA
UniProt
View information about DYKDDDDK on UniProt.org
Go To Top Version: 3    Revision Date: 09-21-2023

8999 BioLegend Way, San Diego, CA 92121 www.biolegend.com
Toll-Free Phone: 1-877-Bio-Legend (246-5343) Phone: (858) 768-5800 Fax: (877) 455-9587

This data display is provided for general comparisons between formats.
Your actual data may vary due to variations in samples, target cells, instruments and their settings, staining conditions, and other factors.
If you need assistance with selecting the best format contact our expert technical support team.

ProductsHere
Login / Register
Remember me
Forgot your password? Reset password?
Create an Account